Jurisprudence
type: Ontology
creation date: 2026-08-01T18:02:29+00:00
imports: http://semantic-mediawiki.org/swivt/1.0

Freedom of Religion/Limitations - Restrictions/Jurisprudence
type: Subject
type: Category:No breakout
type: Category:Limitations - Restrictions
type: Category:Jurisprudence
type: Category:Freedom of Religion
page: https://www.rightspedia.org/Freedom_of_Religion/Limitations_-2D_Restrictions/Jurisprudence
wiki namespace: 0
wiki page content language: en
contents: The Supreme Court ruled in Employment Division v. Smith (1990) that the First Amendment does not provide for religious exemptions to a generally applicable law. In the case, a Native American was fired from his job and denied unemployment benefits for using Peyote, a substance sometimes smoked during religious ceremonies. The court had previously ruled in Sherbert v. Verner (1963) that the First Amendment does provide for that type of exception unless there is a compelling reason to enforce the law anyway (Munoz 2008, 1083). However, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal (2006) appears to undermine this ruling. In that case, a religious group claimed the right to use a drug called hoasca. The Supreme Court held that, under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the government is obligated to grant religious exemptions to general laws unless the government can demonstrate a compelling state interest in regulating the drug’s religious use (“Gonzales v. Centro”). Pandemic: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused many governments to limit religious gatherings. For example, at the outset of the pandemic, Maryland banned gatherings of more than ten people, including religious services (Pitts 2020). Ensuring Success of a Government Operation: In Goldman v. Weinberger (1986), the court upheld an Air Force ban on headgear, which was challenged by an Orthodox Jew seeking to wear a yarmulke while on duty. The court found that the Air Force had a legitimate interest in ensuring obedience and conformity (“Landmark”). Non-Discrimination Law (a notable non-exception): In a landmark case, Masterpiece Cake Shop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission ( 2017), the Supreme Court decided that Colorado anti-discrimination law could not compel a baker to violate his religious beliefs by baking a cake for a same-sex wedding (“Masterpiece”). REFERENCES: Evaldo Xavier Gomes, “The Implementation of Inter-American Norms on Freedom of Religion in the Nat…
page level: Question
question: Jurisprudence
question heading: Under American jurisprudence, what permissible exceptions exist?
right: Freedom of Religion
section: Limitations - Restrictions
wiki page modification date: 2023-02-27T11:53:58Z
modification date#aux: 2460002.9958102
wiki page sort key: Freedom of Religion/Limitations - Restrictions/Jurisprudence

Page name
type: ObjectProperty
page: https://www.rightspedia.org/Property-3APage_name
wiki namespace: 102
wiki page content language: en
wiki page sort key: Page name
type: wpg