Privacy Rights/History/Country sources/United Kingdom - Revision history

ThbigO at 15:24, 1 August 2024

2024-08-01T15:24:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:24, 1 August 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:
	\|question=Country sources		\|question=Country sources
	\|questionHeading=What is the oldest written source in this country that mentions this right?		\|questionHeading=What is the oldest written source in this country that mentions this right?
			\|breakout=United Kingdom
	\|pageLevel=Breakout		\|pageLevel=Breakout
	~~\|breakout=United Kingdom~~		\|contents=The Human Rights Act of 1998 outlines the rights everyone in the UK is entitled to. It is based on the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and is the UK’s way of making the rights outlined in the convention applicable to their laws. Article 8 of the Human Rights Act of 1998 and the ECHR is titled “Right to respect for private and family life”. It reads “Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.” (Human Rights Act of 1998). The Human Rights Act of 1998 refers to “convention rights” when it outlines how the UK government and courts will uphold those rights (Human Rights Act of 1998). Regarding data protection and privacy, the UK passed the Data Protection Act in 2018, which regulates how companies, organizations, and the government can use personal data. It establishes stronger legal protection for sensitive personal information like race, ethnicity, political opinions, religious beliefs, trade union membership, genetics, biometrics, health, and sex life or orientation (Data Protection Act 2018)
	\|contents=The ~~United Kingdom [[Probable year:: 1988]]~~ Human Rights Act ~~entrenched~~ the ECHR ~~into United Kingdom~~ law (~~Liberty, “The~~ Human Rights ~~Act”~~). ~~It protects one’s privacy from unnecessary intrusion, among other~~ rights. ~~Additionally~~, in ~~‘’The Right to Privacy’’ Warren~~ and ~~Brandeis cite Lord Cottenham in [[Probable year:: 1820]] who~~, ~~in agreement with Lord Eldon~~, ~~felt that were a king’s illnesses recorded by a doctor and published while that king was still alive~~, ~~a court would not permit its publishing~~, ~~as he claimed this circumstance would breach the king’s privacy (Warren & Brandeis~~, ~~[[Probable year:: 1890]]~~, ~~205; Bycer~~, ~~[[Probable year:: 2014]]~~) .

	~~https~~:~~//www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/your-rights/the-human-rights-act/~~		References:
	Bycer, M. ([[Probable year:: 2014]]) . Understanding the [[Probable year:: 1890]] Warren and Brandeis “The Right to Privacy” Article. National Juris University. Retrieved Sept. 10, [[Probable year:: 2021]], from https://nationalparalegal.edu/UnderstandingWarrenBrandeis.aspx
	Warren, S. & Brandeis, L. ([[Probable year:: 1890]], Dec. 15). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review 4(5), 193-220. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0017-811X%281890[[Probable year:: 1215]]% 294%3A5%3C193%3ATRTP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-C

			ECHR. “European Convention on Human Rights.” Accessed July 19, 2024. https://echr.coe.int/european-convention-on-human-rights.

			Human Rights Act 1998. “Part 1: The Convention.” HeinOnline, 1998. https://heinonline-org.proxy.lib.miamioh.edu/HOL/Page?collection=cow&handle=hein.cow/zzgb0026&id=20&men_tab=srchresults.
	}}		}}

Import-sysop: transformed

2022-12-28T22:12:36Z

transformed

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, 28 December 2022
Line 6:		Line 6:
	\|pageLevel=Breakout		\|pageLevel=Breakout
	\|breakout=United Kingdom		\|breakout=United Kingdom
	\|contents=The United Kingdom [[Probable year::1988]] Human Rights Act entrenched the ECHR into United Kingdom law (Liberty, “The Human Rights Act”). It protects one’s privacy from unnecessary intrusion, among other rights. Additionally, in ‘’The Right to Privacy’’ Warren and Brandeis cite Lord Cottenham in [[Probable year::1820]] who, in agreement with Lord Eldon, felt that were a king’s illnesses recorded by a doctor and published while that king was still alive, a court would not permit its publishing, as he claimed this circumstance would breach the king’s privacy (Warren & Brandeis, [[Probable year::1890]], 205; Bycer, [[Probable year::2014]]) .		\|contents=The United Kingdom [[Probable year:: 1988]] Human Rights Act entrenched the ECHR into United Kingdom law (Liberty, “The Human Rights Act”). It protects one’s privacy from unnecessary intrusion, among other rights. Additionally, in ‘’The Right to Privacy’’ Warren and Brandeis cite Lord Cottenham in [[Probable year:: 1820]] who, in agreement with Lord Eldon, felt that were a king’s illnesses recorded by a doctor and published while that king was still alive, a court would not permit its publishing, as he claimed this circumstance would breach the king’s privacy (Warren & Brandeis, [[Probable year:: 1890]], 205; Bycer, [[Probable year:: 2014]]) .

	https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/your-rights/the-human-rights-act/		https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/your-rights/the-human-rights-act/
	Bycer, M. ([[Probable year::2014]]) . Understanding the [[Probable year::1890]] Warren and Brandeis “The Right to Privacy” Article. National Juris University. Retrieved Sept. 10, [[Probable year::2021]], from https://nationalparalegal.edu/UnderstandingWarrenBrandeis.aspx		Bycer, M. ([[Probable year:: 2014]]) . Understanding the [[Probable year:: 1890]] Warren and Brandeis “The Right to Privacy” Article. National Juris University. Retrieved Sept. 10, [[Probable year:: 2021]], from https://nationalparalegal.edu/UnderstandingWarrenBrandeis.aspx
	Warren, S. & Brandeis, L. ([[Probable year::1890]], Dec. 15). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review 4(5), 193-220. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0017-811X%281890[[Probable year::1215]]% 294%3A5%3C193%3ATRTP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-C		Warren, S. & Brandeis, L. ([[Probable year:: 1890]], Dec. 15). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review 4(5), 193-220. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0017-811X%281890[[Probable year:: 1215]]% 294%3A5%3C193%3ATRTP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-C


	}}		}}

Import-sysop: transformed

2022-11-25T19:55:04Z

transformed

New page

{{Right section
|right=Privacy Rights
|section=History
|question=Country sources
|questionHeading=What is the oldest written source in this country that mentions this right?
|pageLevel=Breakout
|breakout=United Kingdom
|contents=The United Kingdom [[Probable year::1988]] Human Rights Act entrenched the ECHR into United Kingdom law (Liberty, “The Human Rights Act”). It protects one’s privacy from unnecessary intrusion, among other rights. Additionally, in ‘’The Right to Privacy’’ Warren and Brandeis cite Lord Cottenham in [[Probable year::1820]] who, in agreement with Lord Eldon, felt that were a king’s illnesses recorded by a doctor and published while that king was still alive, a court would not permit its publishing, as he claimed this circumstance would breach the king’s privacy (Warren & Brandeis, [[Probable year::1890]], 205; Bycer, [[Probable year::2014]]) .

https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/your-rights/the-human-rights-act/
Bycer, M. ([[Probable year::2014]]) . Understanding the [[Probable year::1890]] Warren and Brandeis “The Right to Privacy” Article. National Juris University. Retrieved Sept. 10, [[Probable year::2021]], from https://nationalparalegal.edu/UnderstandingWarrenBrandeis.aspx
Warren, S. & Brandeis, L. ([[Probable year::1890]], Dec. 15). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review 4(5), 193-220. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0017-811X%281890[[Probable year::1215]]% 294%3A5%3C193%3ATRTP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-C

}}