Privacy Rights/Culture and Politics/Depends on governance - Revision history

Jkochan1 at 11:41, 20 March 2023

2023-03-20T11:41:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:41, 20 March 2023
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\|questionHeading=Is this right exercised in different ways depending on the political governance regime in place (democracy, autocracy, hybrid regime)?		\|questionHeading=Is this right exercised in different ways depending on the political governance regime in place (democracy, autocracy, hybrid regime)?
	\|pageLevel=Question		\|pageLevel=Question
	\|contents= Rhoda Howard and Jack Donnelly ([[Probable year:: 1986]]) ~~put forth~~ six regime types: liberal, minimal, traditionalist, communist, corporatist (authoritarian), and developmental. When comparing regime type to the ‘valuation of privacy,’ liberal regimes are ranked highly, and minimal regimes are ranked very highly (Howard & Donnelly, [[Probable year:: 1986]], 814). The other regime types, all communitarian regimes rather than individualistic, were ranked low or very low regarding privacy (Howard & Donnelly, [[Probable year:: 1986]], 814). At their cores, communitarian regimes do not have privacy because it can be argued, as Howard and Donnelly ([[Probable year:: 1986]], 211) do, that the allowance of freedoms may lead to self-destruction. Thus, privacy is ignored (Howard & Donnelly, [[Probable year:: 1986]], 211). Fatos Lubonja agrees with this sentiment, writing that privacy did not exist in Albania under the totalitarian regime, and cites his experience in Albanian prisons as an example (Lubonja, [[Probable year:: 2001]]) . He also admitted to self-censorship in the private diaries which originally got him arrested, supposing many others had censored themselves in the same way (Lubonja, [[Probable year:: 2001]], 247).		\|contents=Rhoda Howard and Jack Donnelly ([[Probable year:: 1986]]) describe six regime types: liberal, minimal, traditionalist, communist, corporatist (authoritarian), and developmental. When comparing regime type to the ‘valuation of privacy,’ liberal regimes are ranked highly, and minimal regimes are ranked very highly (Howard & Donnelly, [[Probable year:: 1986]], 814). The other regime types, all communitarian regimes rather than individualistic, were ranked low or very low regarding privacy (Howard & Donnelly, [[Probable year:: 1986]], 814). At their cores, communitarian regimes do not have privacy because it can be argued, as Howard and Donnelly ([[Probable year:: 1986]], 211) do, that the allowance of freedoms may lead to self-destruction. Thus, privacy is ignored (Howard & Donnelly, [[Probable year:: 1986]], 211). Fatos Lubonja agrees with this sentiment, writing that privacy did not exist in Albania under the totalitarian regime, and cites his experience in Albanian prisons as an example (Lubonja, [[Probable year:: 2001]]) . He also admitted to self-censorship in the private diaries which originally got him arrested, supposing many others had censored themselves in the same way (Lubonja, [[Probable year:: 2001]], 247).

	Resources		Resources

	Howard, R.E., & Donnelly, J. ([[Probable year:: 1986]], Sept.) Human dignity, human rights, and political regimes. The American Political Science Review 80(3), 801-817. https://doi.org/10.[[Probable year:: 2307]]/ 1960539		Howard, R.E., & Donnelly, J. ([[Probable year:: 1986]], Sept.) Human dignity, human rights, and political regimes. The American Political Science Review 80(3), 801-817. https://doi.org/10.[[Probable year:: 2307]]/ 1960539

	Lubonja, F. ([[Probable year:: 2001]]) . Privacy in a totalitarian regime. Social Research 68(1), 237-254. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4097[[Probable year:: 1449]]		Lubonja, F. ([[Probable year:: 2001]]) . Privacy in a totalitarian regime. Social Research 68(1), 237-254. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4097[[Probable year:: 1449]]


	}}		}}

Import-sysop: transformed

2022-12-28T22:12:41Z

transformed

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:12, 28 December 2022
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\|questionHeading=Is this right exercised in different ways depending on the political governance regime in place (democracy, autocracy, hybrid regime)?		\|questionHeading=Is this right exercised in different ways depending on the political governance regime in place (democracy, autocracy, hybrid regime)?
	\|pageLevel=Question		\|pageLevel=Question
	\|contents= Rhoda Howard and Jack Donnelly ([[Probable year::1986]]) put forth six regime types: liberal, minimal, traditionalist, communist, corporatist (authoritarian), and developmental. When comparing regime type to the ‘valuation of privacy,’ liberal regimes are ranked highly, and minimal regimes are ranked very highly (Howard & Donnelly, [[Probable year::1986]], 814). The other regime types, all communitarian regimes rather than individualistic, were ranked low or very low regarding privacy (Howard & Donnelly, [[Probable year::1986]], 814). At their cores, communitarian regimes do not have privacy because it can be argued, as Howard and Donnelly ([[Probable year::1986]], 211) do, that the allowance of freedoms may lead to self-destruction. Thus, privacy is ignored (Howard & Donnelly, [[Probable year::1986]], 211). Fatos Lubonja agrees with this sentiment, writing that privacy did not exist in Albania under the totalitarian regime, and cites his experience in Albanian prisons as an example (Lubonja, [[Probable year::2001]]) . He also admitted to self-censorship in the private diaries which originally got him arrested, supposing many others had censored themselves in the same way (Lubonja, [[Probable year::2001]], 247).		\|contents= Rhoda Howard and Jack Donnelly ([[Probable year:: 1986]]) put forth six regime types: liberal, minimal, traditionalist, communist, corporatist (authoritarian), and developmental. When comparing regime type to the ‘valuation of privacy,’ liberal regimes are ranked highly, and minimal regimes are ranked very highly (Howard & Donnelly, [[Probable year:: 1986]], 814). The other regime types, all communitarian regimes rather than individualistic, were ranked low or very low regarding privacy (Howard & Donnelly, [[Probable year:: 1986]], 814). At their cores, communitarian regimes do not have privacy because it can be argued, as Howard and Donnelly ([[Probable year:: 1986]], 211) do, that the allowance of freedoms may lead to self-destruction. Thus, privacy is ignored (Howard & Donnelly, [[Probable year:: 1986]], 211). Fatos Lubonja agrees with this sentiment, writing that privacy did not exist in Albania under the totalitarian regime, and cites his experience in Albanian prisons as an example (Lubonja, [[Probable year:: 2001]]) . He also admitted to self-censorship in the private diaries which originally got him arrested, supposing many others had censored themselves in the same way (Lubonja, [[Probable year:: 2001]], 247).

	Resources		Resources

	Howard, R.E., & Donnelly, J. ([[Probable year::1986]], Sept.) Human dignity, human rights, and political regimes. The American Political Science Review 80(3), 801-817. https://doi.org/10.[[Probable year::2307]]/ 1960539		Howard, R.E., & Donnelly, J. ([[Probable year:: 1986]], Sept.) Human dignity, human rights, and political regimes. The American Political Science Review 80(3), 801-817. https://doi.org/10.[[Probable year:: 2307]]/ 1960539
	Lubonja, F. ([[Probable year::2001]]) . Privacy in a totalitarian regime. Social Research 68(1), 237-254. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4097[[Probable year::1449]]		Lubonja, F. ([[Probable year:: 2001]]) . Privacy in a totalitarian regime. Social Research 68(1), 237-254. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4097[[Probable year:: 1449]]


	}}		}}

Import-sysop: transformed

2022-11-25T19:55:11Z

transformed

New page

{{Right section
|right=Privacy Rights
|section=Culture and Politics
|question=Depends on governance
|questionHeading=Is this right exercised in different ways depending on the political governance regime in place (democracy, autocracy, hybrid regime)?
|pageLevel=Question
|contents= Rhoda Howard and Jack Donnelly ([[Probable year::1986]]) put forth six regime types: liberal, minimal, traditionalist, communist, corporatist (authoritarian), and developmental. When comparing regime type to the ‘valuation of privacy,’ liberal regimes are ranked highly, and minimal regimes are ranked very highly (Howard & Donnelly, [[Probable year::1986]], 814). The other regime types, all communitarian regimes rather than individualistic, were ranked low or very low regarding privacy (Howard & Donnelly, [[Probable year::1986]], 814). At their cores, communitarian regimes do not have privacy because it can be argued, as Howard and Donnelly ([[Probable year::1986]], 211) do, that the allowance of freedoms may lead to self-destruction. Thus, privacy is ignored (Howard & Donnelly, [[Probable year::1986]], 211). Fatos Lubonja agrees with this sentiment, writing that privacy did not exist in Albania under the totalitarian regime, and cites his experience in Albanian prisons as an example (Lubonja, [[Probable year::2001]]) . He also admitted to self-censorship in the private diaries which originally got him arrested, supposing many others had censored themselves in the same way (Lubonja, [[Probable year::2001]], 247).

Resources

Howard, R.E., & Donnelly, J. ([[Probable year::1986]], Sept.) Human dignity, human rights, and political regimes. The American Political Science Review 80(3), 801-817. https://doi.org/10.[[Probable year::2307]]/ 1960539
Lubonja, F. ([[Probable year::2001]]) . Privacy in a totalitarian regime. Social Research 68(1), 237-254. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4097[[Probable year::1449]]

}}