Freedom of Expression/Philosophical Origins/Tradition contributions/Marxism - Revision history

Jkochan1 at 05:03, 8 May 2023

2023-05-08T05:03:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:03, 8 May 2023
Line 7:		Line 7:
	\|pageLevel=Breakout		\|pageLevel=Breakout
	\|contents=Free expression is not a central tenet of Marxism. However, Marx’s early writings display a distaste for censorship. In 1842 he wrote that “the real, radical cure for the censorship would be its abolition” (Marx 1842). Though he strays from this topic in his later writing, he never repudiated his earlier opinions (Heinze 2018). Heinze argues that the idea that Marxism is inherently anti-free-speech is a misconception (regardless of how some specific Marxist regimes have operated). Marx rejected some rights - property rights - because they served the interests of the wealthy and powerful. But free speech is different because it does not serve an underlying interest that Marx opposed.		\|contents=Free expression is not a central tenet of Marxism. However, Marx’s early writings display a distaste for censorship. In 1842 he wrote that “the real, radical cure for the censorship would be its abolition” (Marx 1842). Though he strays from this topic in his later writing, he never repudiated his earlier opinions (Heinze 2018). Heinze argues that the idea that Marxism is inherently anti-free-speech is a misconception (regardless of how some specific Marxist regimes have operated). Marx rejected some rights - property rights - because they served the interests of the wealthy and powerful. But free speech is different because it does not serve an underlying interest that Marx opposed.

			References:

	Marx 1842: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1842/02/10.htm		Marx 1842: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1842/02/10.htm

	Heinze 2018: http://humanityjournal.org/blog/karl-marxs-theory-of-free-speech-part-1/#_ftn5		Heinze 2018: http://humanityjournal.org/blog/karl-marxs-theory-of-free-speech-part-1/#_ftn5
	}}		}}

Jkochan1 at 12:07, 6 February 2023

2023-02-06T12:07:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:07, 6 February 2023
Line 4:		Line 4:
	\|question=Tradition contributions		\|question=Tradition contributions
	\|questionHeading=What have religious and philosophical traditions contributed to our understanding of this right?		\|questionHeading=What have religious and philosophical traditions contributed to our understanding of this right?
			\|breakout=Marxism
	\|pageLevel=Breakout		\|pageLevel=Breakout
	~~\|breakout=Marxism~~		\|contents=Free expression is not a central tenet of Marxism. However, Marx’s early writings display a distaste for censorship. In 1842 he wrote that “the real, radical cure for the censorship would be its abolition” (Marx 1842). Though he strays from this topic in his later writing, he never repudiated his earlier opinions (Heinze 2018). Heinze argues that the idea that Marxism is inherently anti-free-speech is a misconception (regardless of how some specific Marxist regimes have operated). Marx rejected some rights - property rights - because they served the interests of the wealthy and powerful. But free speech is different because it does not serve an underlying interest that Marx opposed.
	\|contents=		Marx 1842: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1842/02/10.htm
	Free expression is not a central tenet of Marxism. However, Marx’s early writings display a distaste for censorship. ~~He once~~ wrote that “the real, radical cure for the censorship would be its abolition” (Marx ~~[[Probable year::~~ 1842]]) . Though he strays from this topic in his later writing, he never ~~repudiates~~ his earlier opinions (Heinze ~~[[Probable year::~~ 2018]]) . Heinze argues that the idea that Marxism is inherently anti-free-speech is a misconception (regardless of how some specific Marxist regimes have operated). Marx rejected some rights - property rights - because they served the interests of the wealthy and powerful. But free speech is different because it does not serve an underlying interest that Marx opposed.		Heinze 2018: http://humanityjournal.org/blog/karl-marxs-theory-of-free-speech-part-1/#_ftn5

	Marx ~~[[Probable year::~~ 1842]]: ~~https~~://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/~~[[Probable year::~~ 1842]]/ 02/10.htm

	Heinze ~~[[Probable year::~~ 2018]]: ~~http~~://humanityjournal.org/blog/karl-marxs-theory-of-free-speech-part-1/#_ftn5


	}}		}}

Import-sysop: transformed

2022-12-28T22:09:10Z

transformed

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:09, 28 December 2022
Line 7:		Line 7:
	\|breakout=Marxism		\|breakout=Marxism
	\|contents=		\|contents=
	Free expression is not a central tenet of Marxism. However, Marx’s early writings display a distaste for censorship. He once wrote that “the real, radical cure for the censorship would be its abolition” (Marx [[Probable year::1842]]) . Though he strays from this topic in his later writing, he never repudiates his earlier opinions (Heinze [[Probable year::2018]]) . Heinze argues that the idea that Marxism is inherently anti-free-speech is a misconception (regardless of how some specific Marxist regimes have operated). Marx rejected some rights - property rights - because they served the interests of the wealthy and powerful. But free speech is different because it does not serve an underlying interest that Marx opposed.		Free expression is not a central tenet of Marxism. However, Marx’s early writings display a distaste for censorship. He once wrote that “the real, radical cure for the censorship would be its abolition” (Marx [[Probable year:: 1842]]) . Though he strays from this topic in his later writing, he never repudiates his earlier opinions (Heinze [[Probable year:: 2018]]) . Heinze argues that the idea that Marxism is inherently anti-free-speech is a misconception (regardless of how some specific Marxist regimes have operated). Marx rejected some rights - property rights - because they served the interests of the wealthy and powerful. But free speech is different because it does not serve an underlying interest that Marx opposed.

	Marx [[Probable year::1842]]: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/[[Probable year::1842]]/ 02/10.htm		Marx [[Probable year:: 1842]]: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/[[Probable year:: 1842]]/ 02/10.htm

	Heinze [[Probable year::2018]]: http://humanityjournal.org/blog/karl-marxs-theory-of-free-speech-part-1/#_ftn5		Heinze [[Probable year:: 2018]]: http://humanityjournal.org/blog/karl-marxs-theory-of-free-speech-part-1/#_ftn5


	}}		}}

Import-sysop: transformed

2022-11-25T19:51:13Z

transformed

New page

{{Right section
|right=Freedom of Expression
|section=Philosophical Origins
|question=Tradition contributions
|questionHeading=What have religious and philosophical traditions contributed to our understanding of this right?
|pageLevel=Breakout
|breakout=Marxism
|contents=
Free expression is not a central tenet of Marxism. However, Marx’s early writings display a distaste for censorship. He once wrote that “the real, radical cure for the censorship would be its abolition” (Marx [[Probable year::1842]]) . Though he strays from this topic in his later writing, he never repudiates his earlier opinions (Heinze [[Probable year::2018]]) . Heinze argues that the idea that Marxism is inherently anti-free-speech is a misconception (regardless of how some specific Marxist regimes have operated). Marx rejected some rights - property rights - because they served the interests of the wealthy and powerful. But free speech is different because it does not serve an underlying interest that Marx opposed.

Marx [[Probable year::1842]]: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/[[Probable year::1842]]/ 02/10.htm

Heinze [[Probable year::2018]]: http://humanityjournal.org/blog/karl-marxs-theory-of-free-speech-part-1/#_ftn5

}}