Freedom of Association/History/Noteworthy written sources - Revision history

RightspediaAdmin at 05:35, 12 August 2024

2024-08-12T05:35:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:35, 12 August 2024
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Neither the Act of Abjuration nor the Union of Utrecht explicitly mentioned the right to free association. The eventual adoption of this right in the Constitution of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in 1848, however, affirmed an ideological movement promoting free association that began in earnest during the Dutch revolution against Habsburg Spain. This experience undoubtedly shaped the Constitution of 1815, which currently recognizes free association as an enumerated right.		Neither the Act of Abjuration nor the Union of Utrecht explicitly mentioned the right to free association. The eventual adoption of this right in the Constitution of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in 1848, however, affirmed an ideological movement promoting free association that began in earnest during the Dutch revolution against Habsburg Spain. This experience undoubtedly shaped the Constitution of 1815, which currently recognizes free association as an enumerated right.

			Pope Leo XIII forcefully argued for free association in Section 51 of Rerum novarum ([[Probable year:: 1891]]) , an extremely influential text in Catholic thought: "Private societies, then, although they exist within the body politic, and are severally part of the commonwealth, cannot nevertheless be absolutely, and as such, prohibited by public authority. For, to enter into a "society" of this kind is the natural right of man; and the State has for its office to protect natural rights, not to destroy them."

			References:

	“Act of Abjuration 1581, Dutch Declaration of Independence.” n.d. Www.age-of-The-Sage.org. https://www.age-of-the-sage.org/history/dutch_independence_1581.html.		“Act of Abjuration 1581, Dutch Declaration of Independence.” n.d. Www.age-of-The-Sage.org. https://www.age-of-the-sage.org/history/dutch_independence_1581.html.
Line 23:		Line 27:

	Netherlands 1814 (Rev. 2008). n.d. Constitute. Comparative Constitutions Project. Accessed August 1, 2024. https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Netherlands_2008.		Netherlands 1814 (Rev. 2008). n.d. Constitute. Comparative Constitutions Project. Accessed August 1, 2024. https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Netherlands_2008.


	~~Pope Leo XIII forcefully argued for free association in Section 51 of Rerum novarum ([[Probable year:: 1891]]) , an extremely influential text in Catholic thought.~~

	"Private societies, then, although they exist within the body politic, and are severally part of the commonwealth, cannot nevertheless be absolutely, and as such, prohibited by public authority. For, to enter into a "society" of this kind is the natural right of man; and the State has for its office to protect natural rights, not to destroy them."

	~~References:~~

	Catholic Church. Pope (1878-1903 : Leo XIII). Rerum Novarum : Enciclica Di Leone XIII Sulla Questione Operaia. Lugano :Edizione a cura dell'Organizzazione cristano-sociale del canton Ticino per la celebrazione del LXX, 1961.		Catholic Church. Pope (1878-1903 : Leo XIII). Rerum Novarum : Enciclica Di Leone XIII Sulla Questione Operaia. Lugano :Edizione a cura dell'Organizzazione cristano-sociale del canton Ticino per la celebrazione del LXX, 1961.
	}}		}}

Dmarsh1 at 03:59, 3 August 2024

2024-08-03T03:59:09Z

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 |questionHeading=Is there another noteworthy written source from the past that mentions this right?
 |pageLevel=Question
-|contents=Pope Leo XIII forcefully argued for free association in Section 51 of Rerum novarum ([[Probable year:: 1891]]) , an extremely influential text in Catholic thought.
+|contents=Freedom of association, as it is defined today, largely originates from the works of various political theorists. Early recognition of this freedom, however, can be found before and after the lifetimes of John Locke, Jeremy Bentham, and John Stuart Mill. Following the enactment of a constitution in 1815, the newly-independent Kingdom of the Netherlands took concrete steps to codify freedom of expression, which took this form following revisions in 1848 and 1983:
 "Private societies, then, although they exist within the body politic, and are severally part of the commonwealth, cannot nevertheless be absolutely, and as such, prohibited by public authority. For, to enter into a "society" of this kind is the natural right of man; and the State has for its office to protect natural rights, not to destroy them."

RightspediaAdmin at 12:28, 14 May 2024

2024-05-14T12:28:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:28, 14 May 2024
Line 9:		Line 9:
	"Private societies, then, although they exist within the body politic, and are severally part of the commonwealth, cannot nevertheless be absolutely, and as such, prohibited by public authority. For, to enter into a "society" of this kind is the natural right of man; and the State has for its office to protect natural rights, not to destroy them."		"Private societies, then, although they exist within the body politic, and are severally part of the commonwealth, cannot nevertheless be absolutely, and as such, prohibited by public authority. For, to enter into a "society" of this kind is the natural right of man; and the State has for its office to protect natural rights, not to destroy them."

			References:

			Catholic Church. Pope (1878-1903 : Leo XIII). Rerum Novarum : Enciclica Di Leone XIII Sulla Questione Operaia. Lugano :Edizione a cura dell'Organizzazione cristano-sociale del canton Ticino per la celebrazione del LXX, 1961.
	}}		}}

Jkochan1: Reverted edits by Jkochan1 (talk) to last revision by Import-sysop

2023-09-05T18:41:22Z

Reverted edits by Jkochan1 (talk) to last revision by Import-sysop

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:41, 5 September 2023
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\|questionHeading=Is there another noteworthy written source from the past that mentions this right?		\|questionHeading=Is there another noteworthy written source from the past that mentions this right?
	\|pageLevel=Question		\|pageLevel=Question
	\|contents=Pope Leo XIII forcefully argued for free association in Section 51 of Rerum novarum ([[Probable year::1891]]) , an extremely influential text in Catholic thought.		\|contents=Pope Leo XIII forcefully argued for free association in Section 51 of Rerum novarum ([[Probable year:: 1891]]) , an extremely influential text in Catholic thought.

	"Private societies, then, although they exist within the body politic, and are severally part of the commonwealth, cannot nevertheless be absolutely, and as such, prohibited by public authority. For, to enter into a "society" of this kind is the natural right of man; and the State has for its office to protect natural rights, not to destroy them."		"Private societies, then, although they exist within the body politic, and are severally part of the commonwealth, cannot nevertheless be absolutely, and as such, prohibited by public authority. For, to enter into a "society" of this kind is the natural right of man; and the State has for its office to protect natural rights, not to destroy them."

	~~References:~~

	~~Rerum Novarum, Encyclical of Pope Leo XII On Capital and Labor~~
	}}		}}

Jkochan1 at 18:40, 5 September 2023

2023-09-05T18:40:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:40, 5 September 2023
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\|questionHeading=Is there another noteworthy written source from the past that mentions this right?		\|questionHeading=Is there another noteworthy written source from the past that mentions this right?
	\|pageLevel=Question		\|pageLevel=Question
	\|contents=Pope Leo XIII forcefully argued for free association in Section 51 of Rerum novarum ([[Probable year:: 1891]]) , an extremely influential text in Catholic thought.		\|contents=Pope Leo XIII forcefully argued for free association in Section 51 of Rerum novarum ([[Probable year::1891]]) , an extremely influential text in Catholic thought.

	"Private societies, then, although they exist within the body politic, and are severally part of the commonwealth, cannot nevertheless be absolutely, and as such, prohibited by public authority. For, to enter into a "society" of this kind is the natural right of man; and the State has for its office to protect natural rights, not to destroy them."		"Private societies, then, although they exist within the body politic, and are severally part of the commonwealth, cannot nevertheless be absolutely, and as such, prohibited by public authority. For, to enter into a "society" of this kind is the natural right of man; and the State has for its office to protect natural rights, not to destroy them."

	References:		References:

	Rerum Novarum, Encyclical of Pope Leo XII On Capital and Labor		Rerum Novarum, Encyclical of Pope Leo XII On Capital and Labor
	}}		}}

Jkochan1 at 10:21, 1 May 2023

2023-05-01T10:21:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:21, 1 May 2023
Line 9:		Line 9:
	"Private societies, then, although they exist within the body politic, and are severally part of the commonwealth, cannot nevertheless be absolutely, and as such, prohibited by public authority. For, to enter into a "society" of this kind is the natural right of man; and the State has for its office to protect natural rights, not to destroy them."		"Private societies, then, although they exist within the body politic, and are severally part of the commonwealth, cannot nevertheless be absolutely, and as such, prohibited by public authority. For, to enter into a "society" of this kind is the natural right of man; and the State has for its office to protect natural rights, not to destroy them."

			References:
			Rerum Novarum, Encyclical of Pope Leo XII On Capital and Labor
	}}		}}

Import-sysop: transformed

2022-12-28T22:08:55Z

transformed

New page

{{Right section
|right=Freedom of Association
|section=History
|question=Noteworthy written sources
|questionHeading=Is there another noteworthy written source from the past that mentions this right?
|pageLevel=Question
|contents=Pope Leo XIII forcefully argued for free association in Section 51 of Rerum novarum ([[Probable year:: 1891]]) , an extremely influential text in Catholic thought.

"Private societies, then, although they exist within the body politic, and are severally part of the commonwealth, cannot nevertheless be absolutely, and as such, prohibited by public authority. For, to enter into a "society" of this kind is the natural right of man; and the State has for its office to protect natural rights, not to destroy them."

}}